[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-editors/leafpad:
From:       Christian Faulhammer <opfer () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2008-03-31 16:24:09
Message-ID: 20080331182409.2205d06e () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>:
> > Seeing as this is an editor and a "GTK+ based simple text editor" I
> > doubt it has much claim to emacs-ness.
> 
> why does this matter ?  if an application includes optional support
> for an "emacs skin" such that it includes emacs
> bindings/shortcuts/whatever, it sounds to me like USE=emacs is
> appropriate.  ive seen random applications that have different
> keybinding modes have the default set, and then optional vi or emacs
> to select from so that things behave as such users would expect. -mike
 
 We have USE=xemacs and emacs...and the key bindings for above editor
will switch to something that is also compatible with XEmacs.  So why
shouldn't one choose USE=xemacs here?  We, XEmacs and GNU Emacs team,
understand "our" USE flags as integration with said editors not
something to mimick their behaviour.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]