[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev]  Re: New SSL Cert for bugs.gentoo.org
From:       Duncan <1i5t5.duncan () cox ! net>
Date:       2008-03-27 2:34:06
Message-ID: pan.2008.03.27.02.34.06 () cox ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Mike Doty <kingtaco@gentoo.org> posted 47EA70AB.8090807@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on  Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:50:03 -0700:

> New cert on https://bugs.gentoo.org due to old cert expiring.
> 
> Fingerprints:
> SHA1: D9:A5:15:AF:66:F4:EF:96:9F:47:DA:98:25:7E:2D:5D:80:1C:CD:FA
> MD5:  28:3B:22:68:9D:F3:7C:2B:A4:08:24:BF:86:EC:80:56
> 3/23/08-3/23/09

Wouldn't it have made more sense if that had been gpg-signed?

If we're worried about security enough to bother with it in the first 
place, why not do it right?

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]