[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in	sys-process/fcron:
From:       Petteri Räty <betelgeuse () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2007-11-20 1:23:07
Message-ID: 474236FB.8080905 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Wolfram Schlich kirjoitti:
> * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-11-09 10:13]:
> > On 08:54 Fri 09 Nov     , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > > 1.1                  sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild
> > > 
> > > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> > >                 
> > > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > >   if useq debug; then
> > use() is useq() now. Dunno whether this is common enough to deserve a 
> > repoman check.
> 
> I won't change that until useq() is going to be finally removed and
> that action is *required* then (all of my ebuilds have useq() for
> control structures, and I'm not going to change *all at once now*
> just because someone has decided to equal use() and useq()... if
> someone feels like spending time on that, feel free to care about
> it ;)).
> 

I added http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199722 for nuking useq in
EAPI 2.

Regards,
Petteri


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]