[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Status of xcb
From:       Thomas Kuther <gimpel () sonnenkinder ! org>
Date:       2007-08-28 17:03:09
Message-ID: 20070828190309.0cc39f6c () SiRiUS ! home
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sa, 25.08.07 12:33 Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Hanno Böck wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
> > While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
> > I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we
> > make xcb default?
> 
> Is there a save way to change from non-xcb to xcb?
> I'm asking because last time I changed from xcb to non-xcb (because I
> needed java for a project), only un-setting the xcb USE-flag and
> rebuilding the packages with changed USE-flags didn't really help but
> I rather had to rebuild all gnome-/gtk-packages manually. Otherwise I
> got the nice "xcb->lock" errors everywhere.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tiziano

I use the proposed libxcb patch from the b.g.o. bug entry.. both, java
and xcb work fine.

Cheers,
Tom

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic