[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gentoo-dev
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Status of xcb
From: Thomas Kuther <gimpel () sonnenkinder ! org>
Date: 2007-08-28 17:03:09
Message-ID: 20070828190309.0cc39f6c () SiRiUS ! home
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sa, 25.08.07 12:33 Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hanno Böck wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
> > While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
> > I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we
> > make xcb default?
>
> Is there a save way to change from non-xcb to xcb?
> I'm asking because last time I changed from xcb to non-xcb (because I
> needed java for a project), only un-setting the xcb USE-flag and
> rebuilding the packages with changed USE-flags didn't really help but
> I rather had to rebuild all gnome-/gtk-packages manually. Otherwise I
> got the nice "xcb->lock" errors everywhere.
>
> Cheers,
> Tiziano
I use the proposed libxcb patch from the b.g.o. bug entry.. both, java
and xcb work fine.
Cheers,
Tom
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic