[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] gnupg2 only vs gnupg-1 & gnupg-2
From:       Jakub Moc <jakub () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2007-05-27 21:30:57
Message-ID: 4659F891.5020605 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

William L. Thomson Jr. napsal(a):
> This has sparked the following open bugs, and countless more closed
> ones :(
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153496
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160302
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164523
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171871
> 
> Probably more open bugs, those are just what I stumbled across while
> looking for OTHER things :)

M'kay... about 3 gnome apps have issues w/ gnupg-2. Seriously, I could
care less; their problem. Maybe upstream will wake up sometimes, or
what's the horrible issue with porting those, beyond 'oh we don't care,
use gnupg-1 because the legacy feeling is oh so great'?

Shrug.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic