[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract
From:       Ned Ludd <solar () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2007-03-27 18:07:40
Message-ID: 1175018860.20959.42.camel () onyx ! private ! gni ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 10:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote: 
> > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> >   
> > > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning
> > > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :)
> > >     
> > 
> > Well, we're on the second floor of the data center which has a quite
> > large basement, which would likely absorb most of the water.  About the
> > only feasible way for our stuff to get flooded is if the San Andreas
> > finally gets the "big one" and the west coast of the US falls into the
> > Pacific, in which case, we'll be worried about other issues, I'm sure.

3rd floor in C.06 actually.

> > That being said, you're more than welcome to assist Infrastructure (and
> > the Foundation) in finding new hosting locations as well as the manpower
> > to bring new services up in those locations or moving existing services.
> > Doing moves like this is a bunch of work, and not something I feel we
> > should be "dumping" on the Infrastructure team.
> > 
> >   
> 

> Can I assume this building has indoor plumbing?  It can be on the top
> floor and still get flooded.  I saw a house once that the hot water
> heater busted and water was about a foot deep and was coming out the
> walls.
> 
> More than one way to "flood" a building.  :/

Flooding/burning etc are not likely to happen. See page two of the spec
for more details.

http://www.365main.com/images/365_Main_San_Francisco_CA.pdf


-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]