[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Topic for Feb council meeting
From:       Olivier Crete <tester () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2007-01-29 20:12:01
Message-ID: 1170101521.2671.1.camel () cocagne ! max-t ! internal
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 2007-29-01 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jan 29 2007, 09:50:28AM CST]
> > > Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either
> > > he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th.
> > > Rinse and repeat.
> > > If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election.
> > > 
> > 
> > Agreed. #3
> > 
> > >From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste
> > of time and resources.
> 
> My only qualm with this approach is whether or not we then risk
> promoting a candidate who was resoundingly defeated during the actual
> election to a Council position because only a handful of people ran for
> the position.

Don't we have a "re-open nominations" item in our electoral process? If
so, we can decide to consider only candidates who are above that
threshold.

-- 
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]