[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64 help
From:       Danny van Dyk <kugelfang () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2007-01-29 12:00:07
Message-ID: 200701291300.07517.kugelfang () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Montag, 29. Januar 2007 00:26 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:17:35 +0100 (MET) Christian Faulhammer
>
> <opfer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | As we all notice from time to time, amd64 team is lacking behind a
> | bit, due to various reasons. a) manpower, b) a lot of keywording.
> |  Java team asked arch teams if they object when Java team marks
> | stable generation-2 ebuilds on their own, due to the long time it
> | takes and to the amount of ebuilds to be stabilised.
> |  So, maybe we can discuss here another helping hand for amd64. 
> | Devs that work with a given software (not necessarily the
> | maintainer) on amd64 architecture and when there is a keywording
> | bug open, then said devs can keyword the ebuild.  For a short
> | period of time this could be allowed to all devs.
> |  Any objections?
>
> Why not just extend the amd64 team to include people who will only
> work on Java stuff? Other arch teams have no problems with developers
> being onboard only for a few particular packages.

No problem with that. The usually process of joining is:
 * Ask Mike,
 * Mike asks Simon and me,
 * Simone and me usually say yes,
 * Mike usually says yes,
 * you're aboard.

It's just that we don't have sufficient _active_ devs. :-/

Danny
-- 
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@gentoo.org>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]