[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev]  Re: GPL-2 vs GPL-2+
From:       Ryan Hill <dirtyepic () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2007-01-28 0:10:43
Message-ID: epgplq$lnj$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
> What I propose is to copy licenses/GPL-2 to license/GPL-2+ and adding the 
> following notes at the start of the two files:
> 
> GPL-2:
> Note: this license states that the software is licensed under GNU General 
> Public License version 2, and you might not be able to consider it licensed 
> under any later version.
> 
> GPL-2+:
> Note: this license explicitly allows licensing under GNU General Public 
> License version 2 or, at your option, any later version.

Was there ever a consensus on this?  I think it's an important issue and
am willing to help with an audit.


-- 
                                        by design, by neglect
dirtyepic gentoo org            for a fact or just for effect
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic