[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gentoo-dev
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL-2 vs GPL-2+
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic () gentoo ! org>
Date: 2007-01-28 0:10:43
Message-ID: epgplq$lnj$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
> What I propose is to copy licenses/GPL-2 to license/GPL-2+ and adding the
> following notes at the start of the two files:
>
> GPL-2:
> Note: this license states that the software is licensed under GNU General
> Public License version 2, and you might not be able to consider it licensed
> under any later version.
>
> GPL-2+:
> Note: this license explicitly allows licensing under GNU General Public
> License version 2 or, at your option, any later version.
Was there ever a consensus on this? I think it's an important issue and
am willing to help with an audit.
--
by design, by neglect
dirtyepic gentoo org for a fact or just for effect
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic