[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Assigning bugs to treecleaners
From:       Curtis Napier <curtis119 () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2006-06-28 23:26:20
Message-ID: 44A3101C.7040908 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:54:02 +0200
> Raphael Marichez <falco@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> IMHO this seems a good idea. The portage tree is growing every week,
>> every month, and it doesn't really suit for the very little systems
>> (embedded linux) nowadays. Furthermore, with the old 2.0-portage, the
>> syncing and caching had become really long.
> 
> If you want to sync just part of the tree, look into setting '--exclude'
> or '--exclude-from' options via PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS in make.conf.
> See rsync(1) and make.conf(5).  Never tried it myself, but it should
> work.
> 


https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2551222.html


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]