[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
From:       "Dan Meltzer" <parallelgrapefruit () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-06-21 22:17:17
Message-ID: 46059ce10606211517x4517252chf7661b3a06fa46c9 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 6/21/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@gentoo.org> posted
> 34384.192.168.2.159.1150898601.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com, excerpted below,
> on  Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:03:21 -0400:
>
> > [Stefan Schweizer wrote...]
> >> qt3 - enable optional qt3 support
> >> qt4 - enable optional qt4 support
> >
> > Maybe I just need a little time to warm up to this. :)
>
[snip]
>
> This should be the clearest from a user perspective, and should require
> the minimal amount of package.use magic, yet it remains an option where a
> user finds it necessary.  There will be a bit of disruption when KDE4
> ultimately stabilizes, but handled correctly, it shouldn't be any more of
> a problem than any major version upgrade on a major desktop environment
> would be -- that is, while some problems should be expected (and well
> published in GWN and the like before stabilization), they should be
> resolvable, and temporary.
>
>

When do you propose qt4 hits make.defaults? When kde4 hits p.mask,
when it hits ~arch, or when it hits arch?

I think mr_bones__ idea was the most appropriate thus far.
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]