[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev]  [RFC] Useflags: qt, qt3, qt4?
From:       George Shapovalov <george () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2006-06-21 7:57:18
Message-ID: 200606210957.18804.george () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

середа, 21. червень 2006 03:46, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò Ви написали:
> On Wednesday 21 June 2006 03:34, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > OK, so we can add qt3 to make.defaults.
> -* says nothing to you? :)
Now I am confused:
My understanding of that proposal was that qt3 is meant to mean "prefer qt3 
over qt4", rather than "enable qt3 unconditionally and see what can be done 
about qt4". So which one is that?
If it is former (preference flag) I do not see aproblem there:
-qt +qt3 = -qt  in such reading.
So, basically the question is about interpretation of -qt +qt3 construct..

George

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]