[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] License advice
From:       "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" <flameeyes () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2006-02-28 14:13:33
Message-ID: 200602281513.34072 () enterprise ! flameeyes ! is-a-geek ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday 28 February 2006 14:46, Martin Ehmsen wrote:
> Should I require a public statement from the authors, like an update
> version on ctan that states the license, or is it enough to refer to the
> bug report? (ie., is it enough that the reporter says that the author
> said the package is public-domain?)
The best thing is probably if the authors can change that directly on CTAN or 
if the reporter can provide a signed statement with a public key that is 
recognized to be of one of the authors at least.

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]