[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] bug #20201 and bbapm
From:       Jakub Moc <jakub () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2006-02-27 17:54:13
Message-ID: 194427272.20060227185413 () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

27.2.2006, 18:23:09, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:15:13 -0500 Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> | bbapm has been masked due to no one responding with anything useful to
> | last rites e-mail.  It will be punted in 30 days.

> No no no. Do this properly. Clean up *all* the broken blackbox applets,
> not just the one that has someone whining on a bug report. There are at
> least two in the tree that're more broken than this.

*Please*, be so kind and look at metadata.xml for those ebuild, then just
either do it *yourself* or ask someone from your fellow-devs in commonbox
herd to do it for the other ebuilds that you failed to mention above...
Don't move broken stuff on other people's shoulders, as you've already done
once.

I fail to see why are you claiming here that there's even more broken stuff
in the tree, yet as a member of maintainer herd haven't dealt with that
properly for quite an extensive period of time - and then you are asking
*other* people to do something "properly".

The fact that there are other ebuilds broken as well isn't any valid reason
for keeping this particular broken thing on portage. That way, nothing would
be punted from portage, ever.

TIA.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)
[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]