[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)
From:       Bret Towe <magnade () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-11-29 2:24:09
Message-ID: dda83e780511281824o12127549ge66cf0f082744454 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/28/05, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) <spider@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:56 -0800, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > >
> > > So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here..  would it
> > > be worth the time spent on this?
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html
> >
> > looks interesting personally id like to see how it acts on kde also
> > and some small c++ apps to see if it hurts them any
> > a single benchmark for a change that would affect so much seems
> > a bit silly to me
>
> Yeah, but before I start to spend too much time hacking on this, I'd
> want to have a suggested metric and performance test setup here. If
> anyone has ideas for a decent test, I'd be happy.
>
> As for KDE, I think modern Gnome would benefit as well, since it has
> been heavily refactioned into libraries these days.

http://www.gnome.org/~lcolitti/gnome-startup/analysis/
you might find this interesting then was posted to lkml a day or 2 ago

one think i forgot to comment on is id like to see what kind of speed
prelink provides also maybe with and without this patch

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]