[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on crazy things in EXTRA_ECONF?
From:       Mike Frysinger <vapier () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2004-11-29 15:15:02
Message-ID: 200411291015.02293.vapier () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 25 November 2004 06:38 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> 1. Should users _expect_ their system to work completely when they pass
> in EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-static" to everything? Should packages be made
> to support this, or would most people here consider that as invalid.
> (see bug #72186).

i'm of the opinion that if they break it, it's not our problem to put the 
pieces back together

> Alternatively, should we strip certain things out of 
> EXTRA_ECONF on a per-ebuild basis?

i dont think so
-mike

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]