[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: /etc/portage clarification
From:       Duncan <1i5t5.duncan () cox ! net>
Date:       2004-09-27 23:15:19
Message-ID: pan.2004.09.27.23.15.13.161633 () cox ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Nicholas Jones posted <20040927220933.GA14289@twobit.net>, excerpted
below,  on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:09:33 -0400:

>>> Users can affect portage via /etc/portage/virtuals, but it is
> 
>> Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/virtuals?
> 
> Seeing as how there is overlap there may be some changes
> coming to a couple files in /etc/portage.
> 
> Support locations in 2.0.51 currently are:
> 
> /etc/portage:
> 	package.keywords
> 	package.mask
> 	package.unmask
> 	package.use
> 
> /etc/portage/profile:
> 	make.globals
> 	make.defaults
> 	package.mask
> 	package.provided
> 	packages
> 	use.mask
> 	use.defaults
> 	virtuals

Thanks.  Nice, concise, clearly defined, and authoritative.  Just what I
was asking for.  I'll be watching for the warned changes, too.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]