[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] 2004.3 - Portage snapshot
From:       Duncan <1i5t5.duncan () cox ! net>
Date:       2004-09-27 21:37:02
Message-ID: pan.2004.09.27.21.37.00.888143 () cox ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Nicholas Jones posted <20040927192503.GA10789@twobit.net>, excerpted
below,  on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:25:03 -0400:

> /var/cache/edb/virtuals is gone. It's calculated from the tree.
> Users can affect portage via /etc/portage/virtuals, but it is
> probably not going to be used/needed by 99.9% of users.

Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/virtuals?  Based on various
comments, I created a place-holder file (as I did with all the
/etc/portage/* stuff, so I can find it when I need to use it) directly
under /etc/portage when I switched to .51, and portage squawked that said
location was depreciated, listing profiles/virtuals as the new location. 
The current .51 questions/comments thread says that should be profile
(singular) not profiles.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]