[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ?
From:       Johannes Findeisen <mailman () hanez ! org>
Date:       2003-01-05 13:13:06
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi achim,

<snip>
> I agree and already too a short look. looks like all these packages need
> gcc-core and the additional sub-package.
> how do you think about an eclass for these builds?
</snip>

an eclass for this thing would be great. afaik the tarballs are all compiling 
the same way. i have looked at the other eclasses and there is allready an 
gcc.eclass, so we need to think about a name and some other things.

in my opinion, the standard gcc ebuilds should be there for bootstrapping. is 
it possible to use the intel c++ compiler icc for bootstrapping?

if this is possible then we could decide to use the gcc compiler without 
java,f77 etc... during the bootstrap process.

i've looked for you on irc but you didn't were there.

i'm really interested in doing some work on this... i'm not a very good 
developer but i'm understanding the eclasses and ebuild script without big 
problems. the only thing is that i'm not working on things like this every 
day.

i've seen that you have retired from the gentoo dev team... is it true???

kind regards
johannes ... ;-)

- -- 
Key fingerprint = DCD0 990F 6BD8 6E5F 439D  4257 D5ED FB77 F58D 4435
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=you%40hanez.org&op=index

begin  .signature
question: is it a feature to execute code in emails?
	i don't think so!
end
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+GC9p1e37d/WNRDURAq0nAJ9Tn0fPyEw5uiY6fsipxuuz/CdLAwCgnjZy
a7/cOwqhc+TuYYCKcuA6cJM=
=tx2F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]