[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-amd64
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
From:       "Tony Sperling" <tony.sperling () dbmail ! dk>
Date:       2007-02-16 12:19:00
Message-ID: 006e01c751c4$a3b49830$a701a8c0 () hip3
[Download RAW message or body]

There is a pretty large ATI community over at Sabayon
(http://www.sabayonlinux.org) most have given up on XGL there, it seems, and
moved over to AIGLX - I'm on nVidia myself, and for me it is mostly stable.
There's a Wiki and an active Forum with a useful Tutorial section, almost
all tech stuff ends up pointing back at Gentoo, so you shouldn't have to
expect any Paradigm Changes!

Tony. . .


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64


> Thanks David.
>
> I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run
> NVidia. I have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't
> run well, on ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its
> lack of 3D acceleration rule out beryl?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@researchdimensions.com> wrote:
> > It runs fine on my system.  I have an NVIDIA card and run it with AIGLX
to
> > avoid the black window bug.
> >
> > The only advantage is it looks pretty.  There's no real benefit to using
it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
> -- 
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]