[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb-patches
Subject:    Re: GDB 13 release -- 2022-10-29 update
From:       Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches () sourceware ! org>
Date:       2022-10-31 12:27:14
Message-ID: 877d0gch5p.fsf () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Joel Brobecker via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Here is a quick update on all the items currently on our radar
> for GDB 13. Philippe's changes are still waiting for approval.
> It would be nice if someone more current with GDB development
> than I took a look, but if not, I will put it on my list of
> patches to review towards late Nov.

I'd like to add gdb/29712 to the list please.  Tom de Vries' part has
been merged.  There's a V2 for my work here:

  https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-October/193217.html

Thanks,
Andrew


>
> Fixed Since the Previous Update:
> --------------------------------
>
>   * [Torbjörn] PR gdb/28549
>     ARM/Cortex-M: improper stack unwinding when the target is in lockup state
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28549
>
>     PR still open, but assume fixed based on Torbjörn's email:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-October/193182.html
>
>   * [Torbjörn]
>     gdb/arm: Handle lazy FPU state preservation
>
> Added Since the Last Update:
> ----------------------------
>
>   * [TomT] PR c++/29243
>     infinite loop in generic_value_print
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29243
>
>     Patch submitted on Oct 18th:
>     https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-October/192804.html
>     Just approved :).
>
> Other Ongoing Items:
> --------------------
>
>   * [PhilippeW]
>     Show locno for 'multi location' breakpoint hit msg+conv var $bkptno $locno
>
>     v3 here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-June/189824.html
>
>   * [TomT] PR symtab/29105
>     new DWARF reader still slow
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29105
>
>     The subject of this PR and the initial message mention that
>     the index cache is still faster than the new DWARF reader.
>     But reading following discussions, it's not clear to me
>     anymore what this ticket is about, or what's left to do.
>     I will follow up on the PR itself.
>
> Thank you all!
> -- 
> Joel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]