[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gdb-patches
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] Share parts of gdb/inflow.c with gdbserver
From: lgustavo () codesourcery ! com (Luis Machado)
Date: 2016-12-26 21:34:00
Message-ID: a2d20bb2-74ca-a621-12ae-fb223e6b5867 () codesourcery ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 12/22/2016 09:39 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> After sharing parts of gdb/terminal.h, it is also needed to share the
> two functions on gdb/inflow.c that are going to be needed by the
> fork_inferior sharing. They are 'gdb_setpgid' and the new
> 'have_job_control'.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 2016-12-22 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>
> * Makefile.in (SFILES): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
> (COMMON_OBS): Add "common/common-inflow.o".
> * common/common-inflow.c: New file, with contents from
> "gdb/inflow.c".
> * inflow.c (gdb_setpgid): Move to "common/common-inflow.c".
> (_initialize_inflow): Move setting of "job_control" to a specific
> function on "common/common-inflow.c".
> * utils.c (job_control): Delete.
>
> gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
> 2016-12-22 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>
> * Makefile.in: Add rule for "common-inflow.o".
> (SFILE): Add "common/common-inflow.c".
> (OBS): Add "common-inflow.o".
> ---
> gdb/Makefile.in | 2 +
> gdb/common/common-inflow.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> gdb/gdbserver/Makefile.in | 5 +++
> gdb/inflow.c | 63 +-------------------------------
> gdb/utils.c | 4 --
> 5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gdb/common/common-inflow.c
>
> diff --git a/gdb/Makefile.in b/gdb/Makefile.in
> index 51c0f73..8372b4a 100644
> --- a/gdb/Makefile.in
> +++ b/gdb/Makefile.in
> @@ -1195,6 +1195,7 @@ SFILES = \
> common/fileio.c \
> common/filestuff.c \
> common/format.c \
> + common/common-inflow.c \
> common/gdb_vecs.c \
> common/new-op.c \
> common/print-utils.c \
> @@ -1622,6 +1623,7 @@ COMMON_OBS = $(DEPFILES) $(CONFIG_OBS) $(YYOBJ) \
> common-agent.o \
> common-debug.o \
> common-exceptions.o \
> + common-inflow.o \
> common-regcache.o \
> common-utils.o \
> complaints.o \
> diff --git a/gdb/common/common-inflow.c b/gdb/common/common-inflow.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..595eb51
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/common/common-inflow.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +/* Low level interface to ptrace, for GDB when running under Unix.
> + Copyright (C) 1986-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> + This file is part of GDB.
> +
> + This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> + (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + GNU General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> +
> +#include "common-defs.h"
> +#include "common-terminal.h"
> +
> +/* Nonzero if we have job control. */
> +
Spurious newline?
> +int job_control;
> +
> +/* This is here because this is where we figure out whether we (probably)
> + have job control. Just using job_control only does part of it because
> + setpgid or setpgrp might not exist on a system without job control.
> + It might be considered misplaced (on the other hand, process groups and
> + job control are closely related to ttys).
> +
> + For a more clean implementation, in libiberty, put a setpgid which merely
> + calls setpgrp and a setpgrp which does nothing (any system with job control
> + will have one or the other). */
newline between comment and function.
> +int
> +gdb_setpgid (void)
> +{
> + int retval = 0;
> +
> + if (job_control)
> + {
> +#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP)
> +#ifdef HAVE_SETPGID
> + /* The call setpgid (0, 0) is supposed to work and mean the same
> + thing as this, but on Ultrix 4.2A it fails with EPERM (and
> + setpgid (getpid (), getpid ()) succeeds). */
> + retval = setpgid (getpid (), getpid ());
> +#else
> +#ifdef HAVE_SETPGRP
> +#ifdef SETPGRP_VOID
> + retval = setpgrp ();
> +#else
> + retval = setpgrp (getpid (), getpid ());
> +#endif
> +#endif /* HAVE_SETPGRP */
> +#endif /* HAVE_SETPGID */
> +#endif /* defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP) */
> + }
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> +/* See common/common-terminal.h. */
> +
> +void
> +have_job_control (void)
> +{
> + /* OK, figure out whether we have job control. If neither termios nor
> + sgtty (i.e. termio or go32), leave job_control 0. */
> +#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS)
> + /* Do all systems with termios have the POSIX way of identifying job
> + control? I hope so. */
> +#ifdef _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL
> + job_control = 1;
> +#else
> +#ifdef _SC_JOB_CONTROL
> + job_control = sysconf (_SC_JOB_CONTROL);
> +#else
> + job_control = 0; /* Have to assume the worst. */
> +#endif /* _SC_JOB_CONTROL */
> +#endif /* _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL */
> +#endif /* HAVE_TERMIOS */
> +
> +#ifdef HAVE_SGTTY
> +#ifdef TIOCGPGRP
> + job_control = 1;
> +#else
> + job_control = 0;
> +#endif /* TIOCGPGRP */
> +#endif /* sgtty */
> +}
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/Makefile.in b/gdb/gdbserver/Makefile.in
> index fe40842..2add910 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/Makefile.in
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/Makefile.in
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ SFILES = \
> $(srcdir)/common/environ.c \
> $(srcdir)/common/fileio.c \
> $(srcdir)/common/filestuff.c \
> + $(srcdir)/common/common-inflow.c \
> $(srcdir)/common/gdb_vecs.c \
> $(srcdir)/common/new-op.c \
> $(srcdir)/common/print-utils.c \
> @@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ OBS = \
> cleanups.o \
> common-debug.o \
> common-exceptions.o \
> + common-inflow.o \
> common-regcache.o \
> common-utils.o \
> debug.o \
> @@ -770,6 +772,9 @@ format.o: ../common/format.c
> filestuff.o: ../common/filestuff.c
> $(COMPILE) $<
> $(POSTCOMPILE)
> +common-inflow.o: ../common/common-inflow.c
> + $(COMPILE) $<
> + $(POSTCOMPILE)
> agent.o: ../common/agent.c
> $(COMPILE) $<
> $(POSTCOMPILE)
> diff --git a/gdb/inflow.c b/gdb/inflow.c
> index 5b55cec..80909ea 100644
> --- a/gdb/inflow.c
> +++ b/gdb/inflow.c
> @@ -803,43 +803,6 @@ create_tty_session (void)
> #endif /* HAVE_SETSID */
> }
>
> -/* This is here because this is where we figure out whether we (probably)
> - have job control. Just using job_control only does part of it because
> - setpgid or setpgrp might not exist on a system without job control.
> - It might be considered misplaced (on the other hand, process groups and
> - job control are closely related to ttys).
> -
> - For a more clean implementation, in libiberty, put a setpgid which merely
> - calls setpgrp and a setpgrp which does nothing (any system with job control
> - will have one or the other). */
> -int
> -gdb_setpgid (void)
> -{
> - int retval = 0;
> -
> - if (job_control)
> - {
> -#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP)
> -#ifdef HAVE_SETPGID
> - /* The call setpgid (0, 0) is supposed to work and mean the same
> - thing as this, but on Ultrix 4.2A it fails with EPERM (and
> - setpgid (getpid (), getpid ()) succeeds). */
> - retval = setpgid (getpid (), getpid ());
> -#else
> -#ifdef HAVE_SETPGRP
> -#ifdef SETPGRP_VOID
> - retval = setpgrp ();
> -#else
> - retval = setpgrp (getpid (), getpid ());
> -#endif
> -#endif /* HAVE_SETPGRP */
> -#endif /* HAVE_SETPGID */
> -#endif /* defined (HAVE_TERMIOS) || defined (TIOCGPGRP) */
> - }
> -
> - return retval;
> -}
> -
> /* Get all the current tty settings (including whether we have a
> tty at all!). We can't do this in _initialize_inflow because
> serial_fdopen() won't work until the serial_ops_list is
> @@ -860,30 +823,8 @@ _initialize_inflow (void)
>
> terminal_is_ours = 1;
>
> - /* OK, figure out whether we have job control. If neither termios nor
> - sgtty (i.e. termio or go32), leave job_control 0. */
> -
> -#if defined (HAVE_TERMIOS)
> - /* Do all systems with termios have the POSIX way of identifying job
> - control? I hope so. */
> -#ifdef _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL
> - job_control = 1;
> -#else
> -#ifdef _SC_JOB_CONTROL
> - job_control = sysconf (_SC_JOB_CONTROL);
> -#else
> - job_control = 0; /* Have to assume the worst. */
> -#endif /* _SC_JOB_CONTROL */
> -#endif /* _POSIX_JOB_CONTROL */
> -#endif /* HAVE_TERMIOS */
> -
> -#ifdef HAVE_SGTTY
> -#ifdef TIOCGPGRP
> - job_control = 1;
> -#else
> - job_control = 0;
> -#endif /* TIOCGPGRP */
> -#endif /* sgtty */
> + /* OK, figure out whether we have job control. */
> + have_job_control ();
>
> observer_attach_inferior_exit (inflow_inferior_exit);
>
> diff --git a/gdb/utils.c b/gdb/utils.c
> index bc1dfe5..6bf3716 100644
> --- a/gdb/utils.c
> +++ b/gdb/utils.c
> @@ -103,10 +103,6 @@ static std::chrono::steady_clock::duration prompt_for_continue_wait_time;
>
> static int debug_timestamp = 0;
>
> -/* Nonzero if we have job control. */
> -
> -int job_control;
> -
> /* Nonzero means that strings with character values >0x7F should be printed
> as octal escapes. Zero means just print the value (e.g. it's an
> international character, and the terminal or window can cope.) */
>
Otherwise looks fine.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic