[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb-patches
Subject:    SIGSEGV on gdb 6.7*
From:       drow () false ! org (Daniel Jacobowitz)
Date:       2008-02-28 16:18:00
Message-ID: 20080228141834.GC8988 () caradoc ! them ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:12:41AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:15 +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > This patch cause testsuite regressions for me, as follows:
> > 
> >         FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: continue to printf
> >         FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: send SIGUSR1
> >         FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: signal sent
> 
> In my experience, this testcase is "nondeterministic", meaning that it
> will go back and forth between PASS and FAIL for no good reason.

The whole testcase is not; there's a few particular subtests that are,
which involve SIGINT.  We've never managed to reproduce that one
outside of expect, unfortunately.

> Is it useful to have such list on the wiki?

Sure, but with attached example logs might be best so that we can
remove them when they're fixed.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]