[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb-patches
Subject:    [rfa] Always define all of TARGET_SIGNAL_*
From:       drow () mvista ! com (Daniel Jacobowitz)
Date:       2002-02-28 9:44:00
Message-ID: 20020228124428.B10331 () nevyn ! them ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:17:40PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>>I've been meaning to fix this since I noticed it last summer.  These 
> >>>numbers
> >>>are part of the remote protocol.  While I think the last ones are never 
> >>>sent
> >>>over the wire, they could be (with the exception of TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST 
> >>>which
> >>>is -not- part of the protocol, as I understand it).  Having them jump 
> >>>around
> >>>is bad.
> >
> >>
> >>Wasn't this enum going to be moved to signals.h?
> >
> >
> >I think so, but I didn't see any pressing reason to.  If you want, I
> >can do that.
> >
> >OK otherwise?
> 
> I'd leave it until after things branch and then fix it properly in the 
> trunk.

I don't really see a point in fixing this nit in the remote protocol
next release rather than this one, but if you prefer I'll wait.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]