[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb
Subject:    Re: [RFC] make gdb handle weak function better
From:       Hui Zhu <teawater () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-08-09 9:10:27
Message-ID: CANFwon3eKnETY_ob4U6mrGqgKvqqL6rNMAr0vh3i+GXUyvs6yw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Now, GDB have support multi-address breakpoint.  I think maybe we can
do some work around it to fix it.

Thanks,
Hui

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:17, Chris January <chris.january@allinea.com> wr=
ote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 16:31 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> That makes sense, although it may be system-specific. =A0Even better
>> would be to revisit our support for multiple-location breakpoints.
>> "break calloc" ought to stop on every instance of calloc.
>
> Aside from breakpoints you still need to know which 'calloc' the dynamic
> linker has bound in order to evaluate function calls, i.e.
> print calloc(100)
> ought to call the same 'calloc' as the inferior.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail message may contain confidential and/or privileged informatio=
n. If you are not an addressee or otherwise authorized to receive this mess=
age, you should not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this e-=
mail or any information contained in the message.
> If you have received this material in error, please advise the sender imm=
ediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
> Allinea Software Limited: Registered in England and Wales No: 6871298
> Registered Address: The Innovation Centre, Warwick Technology Park, Gallo=
ws Hill, Warwick, CV34 6UW, United Kingdom
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]