[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gdb
Subject: Re: GDB 6.5 release process created
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow () false ! org>
Date: 2006-05-19 22:07:33
Message-ID: 20060519220733.GB16297 () nevyn ! them ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 11:13:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 10:25:24 +0000 (UTC)
> > From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:29:44AM -0700, Qunying Pan wrote:
> > > > Hello:
> > > >
> > > > I noticed the gdb/configure file in this prerelease was generated by
> > > > autoconf 2.59d instead of autoconf 2.59. Should we fix it before release or
> > > > we are going to go with autoconf 2.59d?
> > >
> > > Do you think it makes a major difference? I hope it won't.
> >
> > It changes the default infodir and mandir (to follow a more recent version
> > of the GNU Coding Standards), so if different subdirectories use different
> > versions then different subdirectories may install documentation in
> > different places.
>
> Then I think we should stick to 2.59, until the next official autoconf
> release is out.
Yes, I agree. I didn't notice the problem even when I tested
packaging, because the new defaults (/usr/share/info and
/usr/share/doc) are what I've been configuring GDB to use for ages.
The current version is my fault; Debian/unstable upgraded to 2.59d.
Could someone else please regenerate it for me? At some point I'll
have to get a local installation of it together, but not tonight.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic