[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gdb
Subject:    Re: external bugs
From:       Andrew Cagney <ac131313 () redhat ! com>
Date:       2003-03-31 5:51:56
Message-ID: 3E87D77C.6010601 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> What was the consensus as to how we should mark external PR's, for use
> with XFAILed tests?  The reason why I ask is that I wanted to file a
> PR about 'break Class.method' failing in Java: this bug (which is
> different from the 'break Class.method(args)' bug in PR 1039 that I've
> just submitted a patch for) is due to a bug in GCJ, that I've just
> filed a PR for.
> 
> But when I went to create a GDB bug, I noticed that 'external' was a
> category.  That might make sense, but I'd really prefer for this bug
> to be in the 'java' category.  Would adding an 'external' class make
> sense?  Looking at the other classes (doc-bug, sw-bug, test-bug,
> etc.), it seems to me like 'external' would fit in.  Then the bug
> could be set to java/external/suspended, which I think would be a
> useful classification.

What the heck, we've test as both class and category, why not external 
:-)  I've added it.

Andrew


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]