On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Simon Baldwin wrote:

> If my reading of the code is correct here, the probable conservative
> course here is to amend the comments to reflect the code, rather than
> the other way round, noting that arrays sized two elements or less have
> this check suppressed.  And maybe add an explicit test case for
> clarity.  The riskier course is to enable the checks for arrays
> dimensioned two and above, and see what happens.  Any preference?

The code should be adjusted to match the comment, I believe. 

Greetings,
Dirk