[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc-patches
Subject:    Re: GCC 3.1 Released
From:       Florian Weimer <fw () deneb ! enyo ! de>
Date:       2002-05-20 11:43:53
[Download RAW message or body]

Nicola Pero <nicola@brainstorm.co.uk> writes:

>> >> > +<li>Loading of categories has been fixed in certain situations (GNU
>> >> > +runtime only).</li>
>> >> > +<li>The class lookup in the runtime library has been rewritten so that
>> >> > +class method dispatch is more than twice as fast as it used to be (GNU
>> >> > +runtime only).</li>
>> >> 
>> >> IIRC, we agreed to use the spelling "run-time" (adjective), didn't we?
>> 
>> > Ok - thanks - didn't know - the patch will use `run-time' then.
>> 
>> Except that `GNU run time' (with or without a blank?)
>
> Ehmmm ... you don't seem to agree, do you ?  :-)

I missed the second case, so Alexandre is correct: "GNU run time"
(noun) and "run-time library" (adjective) are the preferred forms.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]