[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc-fortran
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (Partial) Implementation of simplificaiton of CSHIFT
From: Steve Kargl <sgk () troutmask ! apl ! washington ! edu>
Date: 2015-12-31 16:13:34
Message-ID: 20151231161334.GA11994 () troutmask ! apl ! washington ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:57:10PM +0800, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > 2015-11-21 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
> > * simplify.c (gfc_simplify_cshift): Work around bootstrap issues
> > due to inappropriate warning options.
>
> > Index: simplify.c
> > ===================================================================
> > + /* GCC bootstrap is too stupid to realize that the above code for dm
> > + is correct. First, dim can be specified for a rank 1 array. It is
> > + not needed in this nor used here. Second, the code is simply waiting
> > + for someone to implement rank > 1 simplification. For now, add a
> > + pessimization to the code that has a zero valid reason to be here. */
> > + if (dm > array->rank)
> > + gcc_unreachable ();
>
> I'm not sure this comment is appropriate as is. At a minimum, it
> should list the version of GCC this was introduced for/with. So,
> something like
>
I have no intention to change the comment.
--
Steve
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic