[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc-fortran
Subject: Re: Gfortran internal tree structure
From: Tobias Burnus <burnus () net-b ! de>
Date: 2008-06-19 9:04:08
Message-ID: 485A2108.8040608 () net-b ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Another thing would be to create a gfc_expr structure next to the
> gfc_code one; I think those two should be the most important ones, but
> maybe also gfc_symbol might be of interest? (Variables,
> derived-types, procedures are all symbols, right?)
(Loosely related: Regarding the trans*.c generated code, arrays are also
of interest -- in this case even for users, which want to mix Fortran
with, e.g., C/C++. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34528 (and also related PR
34742 and PR 35276). However, for users, the true solutions is the
enhanced C interoperability TR (technical report) which is currently
developed.)
>> Incidentally, dump-parse-tree.c could do with updating and, I have no
>> doubt, could always stand some improvement in the format.
> Just one thing: How can I even use those dump-functions?
-fdump-parse-tree
Tobias
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic