[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc-bugs
Subject: Re: gcc compiler bug
From: Alan Modra <alan () linuxcare ! com ! au>
Date: 2000-05-31 23:55:49
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Dale Williamson wrote:
> Synopsis: under certain circumstances the bits of a double number re-
> turned from a function may not be reliably transferred to a variable
> across an equal sign, as in the expression: (double)X = (double)func()
I think you need to read an 80x87 programmer's reference. :-)
Hint: The first two bit patterns you're playing with are NaNs.
--
Linuxcare. Support for the Revolution.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic