[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc-bugs
Subject:    [Bug c++/109247] [13/14 Regression] optional<T> o; o = {x}; wants to use explicit optional(U) constr
From:       "jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs" <gcc-bugs () gcc ! gnu ! org>
Date:       2023-05-31 21:02:13
Message-ID: bug-109247-4-RalHXvAcbh () http ! gcc ! gnu ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247

--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> Discussion in CWG led to this more specific rule that only affects the
> copy/move special member functions, and so doesn't affect the 84849
> testcases:

Correction: it does fix the first three 84849 testcases, which are non-template
forms of the same issue.=
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]