[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc-bugs
Subject:    [Bug fortran/42958] Weird temporary array allocation
From:       "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla () gcc ! gnu ! org>
Date:       2019-03-31 16:44:37
Message-ID: bug-42958-4-xI6BwzfgM3 () http ! gcc ! gnu ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42958

--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #25)
> > If you find anything still missing in the library, please let me know.
> > I thought I had converted everything to the macros, which are fairly
> > easy to change, but I may be mistaken.
> 
> Is there anything left? or could this PR be closed as FIXED?

We still do

    {
      if ((real(kind=4)[0:] * restrict) a.data != 0B)
        {
          __builtin_free ((void *) a.data);
          (real(kind=4)[0:] * restrict) a.data = 0B;
        }
    }

Also, we have space array descriptor fields now, so for GCC 10, we
can finally implement the "allocated" flag.=
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]