[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc-bugs
Subject:    [Bug target/88917] [8/9 Regression] Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text section} - `.LCFI2' {.text.u
From:       "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla () gcc ! gnu ! org>
Date:       2019-01-31 19:19:58
Message-ID: bug-88917-4-Du7ew1Lro0 () http ! gcc ! gnu ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88917

Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Isn't -fasynchronous-unwind-tables part of the GNU/Linux ABI and enabled by
default?  Without it, asynchronous cancellation does not work.

Can we simplify this if we require frame pointers when using inline thunks?  Or
get rid of inline thunks altogether?=
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]