[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc-bugs
Subject:    Re: Is regs_ever_live valid in prologue? (SPARC quirk?)
From:       Jim Wilson <wilson () redhat ! com>
Date:       2002-04-30 18:57:14
[Download RAW message or body]

>Actually, this is too obvious to be the issue.
>What is the problem actually?

I don't care enough to look.  It could be related to the point you made.
The renumbering and the optimizing away of the parameter could be causing
things to get a little confused.

Jim
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]