[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck.
From:       Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey () switchco ! com>
Date:       2000-09-25 17:55:17
[Download RAW message or body]

	I compiled everything with a 'make bootstrap' which builds the
libraries as well. That's very odd that the 2.95 would have worked,
then. I presume I was building 2.96 with the 2.95 compiler but then
shouldn't the bootstrapped 2.96 be building the standard libraries? Do I
need to build everything again *after* performing a 'make install' on
the 2.96?

	thanx & later,

		Ben Scherrey

David Edelsohn wrote:
> 
>         Did you compile the libraries with gcc-2.95 or CVS gcc-2.96?  The
> C++ name mangling has changed, so the compiler version used to build the
> library needs to match the compiler version building an application.
> 
> David

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]