[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: Printing types
From:       Carlo Wood <carlo () runaway ! xs4all ! nl>
Date:       1999-11-08 18:03:22
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:27:27AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > Safe the World from confusion.
> > Fix your error messages!
> 
> Carlo,
> 
[...snip...]
>
> It doesn't harm, either: So if you feel strongly about it, don't try
> to convince others, just go ahead and come up with a patch yourself.
> 
> Regards,
> Martin

Hi Martin,

is there anything else wrong with my patch?  I noted you still
didn't add it to the CVS repository :).  Please let me know:
I *do* feel strongly about this and I offer do any necessary
work to improve the style of printing types.  But you have to
let me know why a patch is rejected, if it is.

Regards,

Carlo Wood

PS I will re-submit my patch to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
   together with a ChangeLog entry this time ;).
   I'll also add one more space to printing functions
   with return type, in this patch (int *func(); became
   int*func();).

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]