[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc
Subject: Re: REGISTER_CONSTRAINTS
From: Jeffrey A Law <law () cygnus ! com>
Date: 1999-09-29 16:58:53
[Download RAW message or body]
In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.9909291736400.19698-100000@biriani.cygnus.co.uk>you
write:
> The documentation states that all ports in existence use register
> constraints. This means that we have some code in the compiler which
> hasn't been compiled and tested in several years. Could we delete all
> the [! REGISTER_CONSTRAINTS] code? How likely is it that a new machine
> description will use no register constraints, and if it is likely, is the
> expected compiler performance penalty bad enough to leave the code in
> there?
I've believed for a while that we should kill the !REGISTER_CONSTRAINTS code.
I don't forsee any port using it, ever.
I vote we kill it.
jeff
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic