[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: LPGL (was "GCC2 merging")
From:       Jason Merrill <jason () cygnus ! com>
Date:       1998-10-23 7:01:31
[Download RAW message or body]

Sounds reasonable.  What do people think of this for C++?  I'd like to have
one phrasing for both headers and .cc files.

  As a special exception, if other files use inline functions or
  instantiate templates from this file, or you compile this file and link
  it with other files to produce an executable, this file does not by
  itself cause the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General
  Public License.  This exception does not however invalidate any other
  reasons why the executable file might be covered by the GNU General
  Public License.

Jason

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]