[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: [cfe-dev] [RFC] Reliable compiler specification setting (at least include/lib dirs) through the 
From:       Nathan Froyd <nfroyd () mozilla ! com>
Date:       2016-10-18 13:46:43
Message-ID: CAGepuV+VpTJfu=RUtEioxx47QgKDCvkeN40wisGt9aceXj1mDg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Ludovic Courtès via cfe-dev
<cfe-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com> skribis:
>
>> Your patches look good! My biggest concern is how the ld wrapper behaves
>> in the presence of response files. Have you tested that?
>
> It surely doesn't (yet?).
>
> However, GCC does not pass "@file" arguments when it invokes ‘ld', and
> the bug report you mentioned ¹ talks about GHC invoking ‘gcc', not ‘ld',
> so I guess it's fine to ignore response files in the ld wrapper.

GCC will pass response files to ld when response files were used in
the invocation of GCC.

-Nathan
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]