[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Intel=AE_Memory_Protection_Extensions_?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?support_in_the_GCC?=
From:       Florian Weimer <fweimer () redhat ! com>
Date:       2013-07-25 11:10:54
Message-ID: 51F107BE.8080305 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 07/24/2013 05:58 PM, Zamyatin, Igor wrote:
> Hi All!
> 
> This is to let you know that enabling of Intel® MPX technology (see details in \
> http://download-software.intel.com/sites/default/files/319433-015.pdf) in GCC has \
> been started. (Corresponding changes in binutils are here - \
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2013-07/msg00233.html)

Thanks, this is interesting.

Can userspace update the translation tables for bounds?  Are the bounds 
stored in Bound Table Entries relative to the starting linear address of 
pointer (LAp) or absolute?  The former would allow sharing bound table 
pages for different pages having memory objects of the same size (which 
happens with some malloc implementations).


-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]