[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: fixed_scalar_and_varying_struct_p and varies_p
From:       Richard Guenther <richard.guenther () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-01-26 15:49:08
Message-ID: CAFiYyc1R+vJACo3XUtj0XrAWVjPxX9sPhsJ5EajU3-T+4LzqwA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Richard Sandiford
<rdsandiford@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'd say open a missed optimization bug with the testcase and go ahead
>> with both patches.
>
> OK, I committed the patches yesterday and I've just opened PR 52000
> for the missed optimisation.

Btw, looking at the m32c code what it does is valid regardless of
MEM_SCALAR_P or MEM_IN_STRUCT_P - I don't see why they should
be relevant.  But it needs to cater for MEM_OFFSET and MEM_ALIAS_SET
at least

> Richard
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]