[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: [MinGW] Failure Building libjava
From:       "Null Heart" <nullheart () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-03-31 7:26:57
Message-ID: 2521a500703310026g4c4242a8p9b51b10b919be1ea () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

>That is consistent with misunderstanding what is in Make.out.log.txt
>and Make.error.log.txt.

In that make errors would appear in the same file as GCJ errors how do
you imagine that confusing the two would make any difference? I would
either have no error or both if GCJ had given an error. Granted, if I
had no errors I wouldn't know where to have started.

> I notice that you didn't answer my question if it fails if you run it
> with -O2 by hand.  If you had, I suspect it would have given you
> output that would have made it clear.

I thought I did, sorry for the confusion. Yes, I tried it by hand. The
very first thing I did was copy and paste the command dumped to the
out file. I basically searched every option looking them over and
continued to slim down the command line until I had almost nothing
left. After I found that the "-O2" option was part of the problem I
rebuilt the command line excluding nothing but the "-O2". It never
produced a single error, and I wasn't using any redirection at the
time.

>Anyway, that problem can be discussed on the java list directly, I'd
>expect they might say more about it there, if you're interested.

As you seem to think that the bug shares the same source and GCJ is
part of the problem I will be heading there next.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]