[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol
From:       dewar () gnat ! com (Robert Dewar)
Date:       2002-07-31 20:49:20
[Download RAW message or body]

> Not to mention the ironic part of all this, which is that other 
> compilers started adding  gcc2_compiled symbols too, defeating the 
> whole purpose of it in the first place.

it's like intel compatible processors pretending they are made  by intel :-)
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]