[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: tablejump index
From:       Momchil Velikov <velco () fadata ! bg>
Date:       2002-07-31 6:52:19
[Download RAW message or body]

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

Richard> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:06:48PM +0300, Momchil Velikov wrote:
>> How about having a mode where the operand 0 of the tablejump expander
>> is an index into the jump table, instead of jump target address?

Richard> See casesi.

Thanks.  It was a stupid proposal.  The compiler does the right thing
having an expandeer where the compiler does nothing and having an
expander where the compiler does everything.

~velco
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]