[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gcc
Subject:    Re: GCC 3.1 Release
From:       Michael Matz <matzmich () cs ! tu-berlin ! de>
Date:       2002-04-15 19:11:02
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> > This means 5 month for GCC 3.2 after GCC 3.1 is released?  I though we
> > had a 6 month cycle - and the point was to *extend* the period not to
> > shorten it,
>
> I was unclear.  The proposal the SC is voting on is to create a 7-month
> cycle, as opposed to our current 6-month cycle.

So, you meant actually to push back the _release_ of 3.2 to january 1st,
right? (June + 7 == 13)  Or you already included the month from May to
June into those 7 months?  Then you meant december 1st?  But certainly not
october, right?


Ciao,
Michael.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]