[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: gcc
Subject: Re: [Ada] fix lib and tools build
From: Laurent Guerby <guerby () acm ! org>
Date: 2002-03-31 21:03:28
[Download RAW message or body]
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> This patch looks fine to me. I just have build all of ada with it for
> the first time since the broken merge happened. Thanks.
Thanks for testing, I'll wait for an Ada maintainer approval for HEAD.
> It's -r gcc-3_1-branch if you want the 3.1 branch.
Silly me :).
> But since Ada on 3.1 and mainline are quite different at the moment,
> it might not make sense to apply your patch there.
I tested and the current 3.1 branch has 23 more ACATS failures
than HEAD (ie same status as head of end of february 2002).
I tried to replace the 3.1 gcc/ada directory by the HEAD
one but got link failures probably due to backend symbol
name changes, I didn't investigate further
Richard, I didn't follow closely the changes to the backend, are
there any impossibility in getting the HEAD ada sources compilable
in the 3.1 branch, I noticed nearly/all of your backend
fixes have been commited to both head and branch.
Robert, what is the plan for 3.1? Does ACT work with 3.1 or HEAD?
--
Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic