[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gauntlet-user
Subject:    [GAUNTLET-USER] RE: E320 Legato Question
From:       Scott Montgomery <scott_montgomery () mail ! com>
Date:       2000-11-30 22:12:25
[Download RAW message or body]

There were a couple of problems involving special hostname characters, case
(in)sensitivity, and particularly the save and apply mechanism.  Between 1.0
and 1.5 the mechanism was improved so that transferring the configuration
set took less time so that the window of the primary and secondary nodes
being 'different' was made much smaller.

Please inform your support representative that the download is currently
available.  If they don't know how to get it, ask to be escalated.  The
backline team is all over it.

S

------Original Message------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Preßnig_Markus?= <markus.pressnig@schoeller.at>
To: Multiple recipients of list <gauntlet-user@mail.rmsbus.com>
Sent: November 30, 2000 2:52:46 PM GMT
Subject: [GAUNTLET-USER] RE: E320 Legato Question


Scott,

What kind of HA issues did you have with 1.0?
Mine is workin'  fine so far (except my extra exercise)
I know that 1.5 is released, but NAI told me that i´ve to send my box to
them for an upgrade?!
They said, that currently there is no update script available!

Markus


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Scott Montgomery [SMTP:scott_montgomery@mail.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, November 30, 2000 1:21 AM
> To:	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:	[GAUNTLET-USER] RE: E320 Legato Question
> 
> I'd never like to say something was released with problems, but we
> definitely found out the hard way that 1.0 has some HA issues.  There is a
> software upgrade available that will take your systems to 1.5 which
> includes
> both enhancements to the way HA works as well as bug fixes.  I would
> recommend (strongly) getting it.
> 
> S
> 
> ------Original Message------
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pre=DFnig_Markus?= <markus.pressnig@schoeller.at>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <gauntlet-user@mail.rmsbus.com>
> Sent: November 29, 2000 3:12:29 PM GMT
> Subject: [GAUNTLET-USER] RE: E320 Legato Question
> 
> 
> Gauntlet Admins,
> 
> I tried to modify the behaviour of the legato cluster failover function
> (E320 v1.0), but it=B4s not working!
> 
> The cluster should shutdown the active node, when it looses the link on =
> the
> productional interfaces (hme0, hme1)!
> 
> I figured out that the "State Monitor"-Script is calling "sh =
> /etc/netstart
> test_exist",
> so i added the following lines to the test_exist section in =
> /etc/netstart:
> 
> "test_exist")
> .....
> [snip]
> ......
> # my own tests
> ndd -set /dev/hme instance 0
> if [ `ndd -get /dev/hme link_status` =3D 0 ]; then EXIST=3D1; fi
> ndd -set /dev/hme instance 1
> if [ `ndd -get /dev/hme link_status` =3D 0 ]; then EXIST=3D1; fi
> 
> if [ $EXIST -eq 1 ]; then
> echo "WebShield does not exist on this node."
> else
> echo "WebShield does exist on this node."
> fi
> ;;
> 
> When i run sh /etc/netstart test_exist and hme0 or hme1 has no link -
> "WebShield does not exist" is returned!
> 
> so my script is working.
> 
> but the cluster is not shutting down the active node!!
> 
> I think i still did not understand under which conditions the legato =
> cluster
> is shutting down a node!
> 
> Please help
> 
> Kind Regards
> 
> Markus Pressnig
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
> Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup


______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]