[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gauntlet-user
Subject:    Re: MBONE support for Gauntlet?
From:       Frederick M Avolio <avolio () tis ! com>
Date:       1997-10-23 8:46:46
[Download RAW message or body]

Actually, if you are going to add something to Gauntlet, you probably
should try to add the MBone stuff done for the FWTK. Certainly more secure
than UDPrelay.

This is not an official suggestion, nor will it be supported. You know...

f


At 08:31 AM 10/22/97 -0500, Scott Thomas wrote:
>Fred,
>thanks for the info.  I suspected as much.  We definitely need this
>capability.  Hopefully,
>more of your customers will also request this.
>
>In the mean time, can you suggest how we might support MBone with Gauntlet?
>Jesse Whyte mentioned udprelay, which may be fine. I just need to investigate
>all
>the security ramifications.  Are there other possibilities?
>
>Frederick M Avolio wrote:
>
>> I was checking on an answer. Not supported. No plans in the near future
>> that I can see. Plans change based on user requirements. Keep in mind, the
>> FWTK Mbone solution requires modified  client software.
>>
>> f
>>
>> At 10:39 AM 10/20/97 -0500, Scott Thomas wrote:
>> >Hello all,
>> >since I did'nt see any reponses, I thought I re-post this question
>> >again...
>> >(but with a new subject line)
>> >
>> >> TIS has written a white paper for an MBone proxy for the TIS
>> >> Internet Firewall Toolkit (FWTK) see
>> >>  http://www.tis.com/docs/research/network/mbone/oaklandpap.html )
>> >...
>> >> does anyone know if this MBone proxy is supported by Gauntlet?
>
>--
>Scott Thomas
>Principal Engineer
>Trident Systems, Inc.
>Phone: 703-359-6226
>  Fax: 703-273-6608
>Email: scott@tridsys.com
>
>
>
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]